Risk and Protective
Factors in Adulthood
PI: Arnold Sameroff, Ph.D.
Co-Investigators: Tim Kasser, Ph.D.
John Schulenberg, Ph.D.
Leslie Gutman, Ph.D.
Katherine Rosenblum, Ph.D.
During the transition to adulthood youth
become more independent of their families and play a more active role
in their own development. Our concern with self-regulation as a major
indicator of mental health has led us to assess the individual's adaptation
to the growing autonomy inherent in adult status. We will examine how
a sample of individuals who have been followed from infancy through
adolescence in the Rochester Longitudinal Study have managed the transition
from adolescence into adulthood. The sample will be assessed at 30 years
of age for current status in mental health, educational and occupational
achievement, future aspirations, and participation in intimate social
relationships and community activities using structured phone interviews
and self-administered questionnaires.
Three of the major findings from previous
research with this sample studied from birth to 18-years of age will
be reexamined. These findings were (1) children in environments with
more risks have worse mental health and cognitive outcomes than children
in environments with fewer risks, independent of the specificity of
the risks involved, (2) high competent children raised in high risk
environments have worse outcomes than low competent children raised
in low risk environments, and (3) youth who aspired to material goals
of financial success more than prosocial goals of self-acceptance
and social affiliation had worse mental health.
Contrasts will be made between the developmental
course of groups of children who were at high and low environmental
risk during childhood. The life course for cases of resilient and
non-resilient individuals will be compared to identify promotive and
protective factors that foster healthy development. In addition information
will be collected from participants who have become parents on current
environmental risk and mental health of their children to compare
with participants' mental health and environmental risks in their
families-of-origin to determine the extent of intergenerational continuity
in behavior.