| The 
              proponents of the slave trade lobbied extensively against famous 
              orators such as William Wilberforce, a prominent abolitionist, to 
              protect their property and their livelihood. In Parliament, the 
              supporters of the trade had to defend their position against Wilberforce's 
              powerful three-hour argument supporting the trade's abolition. (62) 
              The supporters of the trade argued in their speeches and petitions 
              that further development of the islands was necessary for the security 
              of Great Britain, the strength of British manufactures, and the 
              strength of the navy. (63) They 
              further asserted that agriculture in the islands could not be carried 
              on without slave labor. This assertion rang true with the economic 
              principles of Great Britain. In 1798, the younger William Pitt, 
              Britain's Prime Minister, estimated that the income derived from 
              the West Indies was greater than that from the whole of the rest 
              of the empire including Ireland. (64) 
              The West Indies were an area of great attention for Parliament and 
              at the heart of the slavery question.  | 
             
              
             | 
           
         
       
     | 
  
   
     
      
         
          |  
            
           | 
          The 
            supporters of slavery could not have been more correct about the French 
            threat to the British islands. The famous abolitionist, James Ramsay, 
            wrote An Essay on the Treatment and Conversion of African Slaves 
            in the British Sugar Colonies in 1784. (65) 
            This essay described the harsh treatment of British slaves in the 
            colonies. He asserted that the French gave their negroes more food, 
            holidays, religious instruction, private property, and in general, 
            more humane treatment than did the English. (66) 
            This discrepancy between the French and British attitudes towards 
            the institution inclined slaves to favor the French. Unlike the French 
            planters who lived and worked on the plantations, "the English 
            planter, if out of debt, must run away to England...where generally 
            lost to every useful purpose in life, he vies with nobility in extravagance...while 
            his attorney, and manager, are obliged to overwork, and pinch, his 
            poor slaves, to keep up, or increase the usual remittances." 
            (67) The English plantation system, 
            therefore, presented a perfect environment for tension and conflict. 
            The slaves, as a result, turned to France. For the good of the cause, 
            they murdered men, women, or children with equal indifference; and 
            when hunted down, died with the cry Vive la Republique. (68) | 
         
       
     |