Table 1. Schematic Representation of Areas Members of Focus Groups Saw as Having Improved or Worsened in Previous Decade, Estonia 1996

Improved Male Female
Estonians Tallinn-Higher Education E,F E,F
Russians Tallinn -Higher Education E,P P,E
Estonians Tartu- Secondary Education P,E P,E
Estonians Tamsalu-Secondary Education M,E P,E
Russians Narva-Secondary Education E,P E,P
Russians Sillimae-Secondary Education E,P E,F
Worsened
Male
Female
Estonians Tallinn-Higher Education E,M E,F
Russians Tallinn -Higher Education E,P F,E
Estonians Tartu- Secondary Education E,M E,F
Estonians Tamsalu-Secondary Education E E
Russians Narva-Secondary Education E,P E,P
Russians Sillimae-Secondary Education M,E E,F

E-Economic opportunity, inequality, poverty, standard of living, etc., especially at the microlevel of the individual or household

P-Personal Freeedom, cultural expression, discrimination, etc.

F-Family values, children's upbringing, interpersonal relations, etc.

M-Macrosocial and political aspects, government leaders, pollution, crime, international relations, etc.

Return to | Current Paper | Table of Contents | Workshop and Papers | FSU Grant Homepage | CREES Homepage