To characterize a linguistic level L,
On the other hand,
This suggests that
It appears that
Furthermore,
We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis:
To provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K),
From C1, it follows that
For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest,
Analogously,
Clearly,
Note that
Of course,
Suppose, for instance, that
Thus
With this clarification,
Conversely,
We have already seen that
By combining adjunctions and certain deformations,
I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that
If the position of the trace in (99c) were only relatively inaccessible to movement,
However, this assumption is not correct, since
Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in (96) and (97), we see that
In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81),
So far,
Nevertheless,
For one thing,
Summarizing, then, we assume that
A consequence of the approach just outlined is that
Presumably,
On our assumptions,
It may be, then, that
It must be emphasized, once again, that
Let us continue to suppose that
Notice, incidentally, that