Methods: Bovine incisors were embedded in cold-cure acrylic resin. The labial surface of each tooth was ground to expose enamel (E) or dentin (D). A cylindrical button of FiltekTM Z250 A3 (3M ESPE, 2.36mm diameter, 2mm height) was cured on the tooth surfaces treated with Scotchbond Universal (SBU, 3M ESPE), Xeno IV (XE4, Dentsply), Xeno V+ (XE5, Dentsply), Clearfil SE Bond, (CSE, Kuraray), G-aenial Bond (GAE, GC), iBond SE (IBS, Heraeus Kulzer), Optibond All-in-one (OAI, Kerr), AdheSE One F (AOF, Ivoclar-Vivadent) in SE mode according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and in TE mode after a 15s phosphoric acid etch (n=6). A notched-edge shear method (Ultradent) was used to measure the SBS.
Results: The table shows the SBS in MPa. The standard deviations (SD) are given in parentheses. All data per substrate were analyzed by ANOVA and multiple comparisons using Fisher’s LSD procedure (p<0.05). Means with the same letters are statistically the same.
Material |
E_SE [MPa] |
D_SE [MPa] |
E_TE [MPa] |
D_TE_moist [MPa] |
D_TE_dry [MPa] |
SBU |
27.7(5.5)a |
28.7(5.3)a |
32.8(4.8)ab |
29.3(4.7)a |
21.8(3.3)a |
XE4 |
18.1(2.5)b |
28.4(5.8)a |
29.3(6.0)b |
28.8(7.7)a |
15.0(2.1)bc |
XE5 |
13.1(7.1)bc |
13.9(4.0)bc |
19.5(4.9)cd |
15.4(2.8)bc |
17.4(5.2)b |
GAE |
22.2(2.9)b |
13.1(3.5)bc |
21.8(2.9)cd |
12.4(1.8)c |
9.5(3.3)d |
IBS |
19.8(3.0)b |
12.5(1.4)c |
23.4(5.1)c |
13.1(1.9)c |
7.4(0.9)d |
OAI |
22.7(5.2)ab |
31.0(3.0)a |
35.4(1.3)a |
19.1(2.2)b |
11.0(5.2)cd |
AOF |
13.1(1.4)bc |
15.3(0.7)b |
17.3(1.7)d |
16.6(0.2)bc |
14.1(3.9)bc |
Conclusions: Multiple statistically significant differences were found. SBU yielded equivalent or higher SBS in SE and TE modes than the one bottle SE adhesives.
Keywords: Acid etch, Adhesion and Dentin bonding agents
See more of: Dental Materials 1: Adhesion - Bond Strength Testing and Mechanisms