Methods: 135 dentists that utilized different cements in their practice were asked to evaluate several handling and clinical characteristics associated with the new cement in a clinical trial conducted by an independent agency. The cement was used according to manufacturer’s directions. Dentists were given two choices on the cement excess clean-up: traditional 2 minute wait, or 5 sec tack-light-cure of the cement on each side. Dentists rated performance criteria for excess cement removal and the speed of clean-up.
Results: Responses were analyzed for each characteristic and summarized in tables below. Additional data showed about 1% post-op sensitivity and overall satisfaction greater than 90%.
|
Ease of Excess-Cement Removal, % dentists |
|
|
|
Self-Cure Mode |
Tack Light-Cure Mode |
|
Very Easy |
37 |
34 |
|
Easy |
42 |
40 |
|
Neutral |
13 |
10 |
|
Difficult, but acceptable |
3 |
5 |
|
Very difficult, not acceptable |
2 |
1 |
|
|
Faster and easier excess cement clean-up for tack light-cure option, % dentists |
Strongly agree |
38 |
Agree |
40 |
Neutral |
18 |
Disagree |
4 |
Conclusions: Chi-Square and Confidence Interval tests for one and two proportions were performed. Data for the ease of clean-up showed no statistical difference between the proportions of dentists who found the self-cure option easy/very easy, versus the number of dentists who found the tack light-cure option easy/very easy. (Using a t-test for two proportions, p=0.59). Calculating a 95% Confidence Interval based on this data, it’s estimated that 71-85% of all dentists would find that the light-cure option provides a faster excess cement clean-up.
Keywords: Cements, Clinical trials, Dental materials, Fluoride and Glass ionomers