�����������
Objective: To compare the curing stress, compressive strength (CS), diametral tensile strength (DTS), and wear properties of a 3M experimental Bulk-fill low-stress flowable with some other commercially available Bulk-fill flowable materials. �
Methods: Materials used were an experimental Bulk-fill
flowable material from 3M ESPE, Filtek� Supreme Ultra Flowable (3M ESPE), Grandio�
SO Heavy Flow (Voco), SureFil
The properties measured are summarized in the following table, with p values vs. the experimental flowable included.
Materials | Compressive Strength �(MPa) | Diametral tensile Strength (MPa) | Wear (�m) | |||
Experimental 3M flowable | 349.9(8.8) |
| 70.3(10.3) |
| 14.7(0.55) |
|
SureFil SDR flow | 222.9(5.3) | P = 0.00 | 48.7(5.7) | p = 0.01 | 24.6(0.66) | p = 0.00 |
Venus Bulk Fill | 317.7(16.1) | p = 0.00 | 59.3(7.5) | p = 0.09 | 21.7(1.00) | p = 0.00 |
Conclusion: ��The new 3M experimental bulk-fill flowable material had similar stress level during cure when compared with current low stress flowables on the market.� It showed statistically higher compressive strength and better wear properties compared with SureFil SDR flow and Venus Bulk Fill.� Its diametral tensile strength was also statistically higher than SDR flow.
Keywords: Composites, Dental materials, Polymerization and Wear
See more of: Dental Materials 7: Polymer-based Materials-Physical Properties and Performance