Methods: A rectangular model (68 x 30 x 15mm) was made of polymethylmethacrylate resin to simulate half of the mandibular arch. The model was completed with resin replicas replacing the first premolar and second molar, and two 3.75 X 11mm threaded implants replacing the second premolar and first molar. Roots of the teeth replicas were covered with an Impregum Soft layer to simulate the periodontal ligament. Different load application points were coupled to the device and the following loads were applied: 1 – single vertical loading on the premolar and molar crowns (5kgf); 2 - simultaneous vertical loading on the crowns replacing the premolar and molar (10kgf). Three points in the cervical area, between the teeth and implants, and one point in apical area of each implant were considered.
Results: Table 1- Stress values (MPa) in the predetermined points of interest
Points of interest |
With 2nd molar |
Without 2nd molar |
||||
Load application: |
Load application: |
|||||
Molar |
Simultaneous |
Premolar |
Molar |
Simultaneous |
Premolar |
|
1 |
6.28 |
8.83 |
6.17 |
15.75 |
10.54 |
2.66 |
2 |
1.38 |
7.13 |
10.11 |
5.53 |
4.58 |
7.77 |
3 |
26.93 |
22.99 |
25.33 |
11.07 |
20.01 |
10.54 |
4 |
15.65 |
15.43 |
4.15 |
8.2 |
13.73 |
4.47 |
5 |
4.04 |
3.51 |
2.77 |
3.09 |
2.43 |
3.62 |
After photoelastic qualitative and quantitative analysis, the results showed that the presence of a second molar proximal contact optimizes the stress distribution around the implants.
Conclusions: The presence of effectiveness proximal contact reduces stresses around the implants under vertical static load and that premature occlusal contacts concentrate the stresses around the loaded implant.
Keywords: Biomechanics, Implants, Loading, Occlusion and Prosthodontics
See more of: Implantology Research