Method: Human enamel specimens were demineralized to create three groups each of “early” (EL) and “advanced” (AL) non-cavitated caries-like lesions (N=18/group). After being analyzed for surface microhardness (SMH), specimens were exposed for 20 days to a pH-cycling remineralization/demineralization model. During the cycling period, EL and AL groups were treated 4 times/day for one minute with either LISTERINE® TOTAL CARE with 0.0221% NaF at pH 3.5 (LpH) or ACT® TOTAL CARE with 0.02% NaF at pH 6.5 (NpH), or deionized water at pH 7.0 (H2O). SMH (10d, 20d) and lesion fluoride content (microdrilling method; 20d) were determined. Lastly, specimens were demineralized again for two hours to determine resistance to a simulated plaque acid challenge (SPAC). Data were analyzed using ANCOVA (α=0.05).
Result:
Lesion |
Treatment |
Surface Microhardness Number (Mean+/-SD) |
Fluoride |
|||
Type |
Group |
Baseline |
10-day |
20-day |
SPAC |
Content |
EL |
H2O |
109±7 |
86±10 |
83±10 |
76±11 |
50±12 |
EL |
LpH |
113±8 |
127±16 |
144±22 |
136±20 |
221±94 |
EL |
NpH |
113±8 |
122±12 |
131±13 |
126±14 |
171±45 |
AL |
H2O |
37±6 |
45±8 |
48±8 |
42±9 |
62±20 |
AL |
LpH |
37±5 |
59±11 |
68±9 |
62±8 |
520±103 |
AL |
NpH |
37±6 |
57±10 |
68±11 |
64±11 |
506±123 |
Both LpH and NpH rinses remineralized early and advanced lesions significantly better than H2O(p<0.001) at both 10 and 20 days. LpH was significantly more effective than NpH in remineralizing(p =0.006), promoting fluoride uptake(p=0.017), and resisting SPAC(p=0.03) in EL after 20 days of cycling. No significant differences were found between LpH and NpH treatments in AL.
Conclusion: While both fluoride mouthrinses showed remineralization and fluoride uptake promotion potential, LpH demonstrated significantly enhanced efficacy in less demineralized non-cavitated lesions.
Keywords: Demineralization, Fluoride, Mouthrinses and Remineralization
See more of: Cariology Research - Demin/Remineralization