1415 Effect of pH on Remineralization Efficacy of Over-the-counter Fluoride Mouthrinses

Saturday, March 24, 2012: 9:45 a.m. - 11 a.m.
Presentation Type: Poster Session
D. SHARMA, Johnson & Johnson Consumer & Personal Products Worldwide, Skillman, NJ, C. GONZALEZ-CABEZAS, Cariology, Restorative Sciences and Endodontics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, D. RICCI-NITTEL, RD&E Oral Health, Johnson & Johnson Consumer & Personal Products Worldwide, Morris Plains, NJ, and J. EDER, Oral Health Research Institute - Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
Objective:  Determine the effect of pH on the enamel remineralization efficacy of fluoride mouthrinses on non-cavitated lesions with different levels of demineralization.  It has been hypothesized that lower pH fluoride treatments enhance remineralization, particularly in less demineralized non-cavitated early lesions.

Method: Human enamel specimens were demineralized to create three groups each of “early” (EL) and “advanced” (AL) non-cavitated caries-like lesions (N=18/group).  After being analyzed for surface microhardness (SMH), specimens were exposed for 20 days to a pH-cycling remineralization/demineralization model.  During the cycling period, EL and AL groups were treated 4 times/day for one minute with either LISTERINE® TOTAL CARE with 0.0221% NaF at pH 3.5 (LpH) or ACT® TOTAL CARE with 0.02% NaF at pH 6.5 (NpH), or deionized water at pH 7.0 (H2O).  SMH (10d, 20d) and lesion fluoride content (microdrilling method; 20d) were determined.  Lastly, specimens were demineralized again for two hours to determine resistance to a simulated plaque acid challenge (SPAC).  Data were analyzed using ANCOVA (α=0.05). 

Result:

 

Lesion

Treatment

Surface Microhardness Number (Mean+/-SD)

Fluoride

Type

Group

Baseline

10-day

20-day

SPAC

Content

EL

H2O

109±7

86±10

83±10

76±11

50±12

EL

LpH

113±8

127±16

144±22

136±20

221±94

EL

NpH

113±8

122±12

131±13

126±14

171±45

AL

H2O

37±6

45±8

48±8

42±9

62±20

AL

LpH

37±5

59±11

68±9

62±8

520±103

AL

NpH

37±6

57±10

68±11

64±11

506±123

Both LpH and NpH  rinses remineralized early and advanced lesions significantly better than H2O(p<0.001) at both 10 and 20 days.  LpH was significantly more effective than NpH in remineralizing(p =0.006), promoting fluoride uptake(p=0.017), and resisting SPAC(p=0.03) in EL after 20 days of cycling.  No significant differences were found between LpH and NpH treatments in AL. 

Conclusion: While both fluoride mouthrinses showed remineralization and fluoride uptake promotion potential, LpH demonstrated significantly enhanced efficacy in less demineralized non-cavitated lesions.


Keywords: Demineralization, Fluoride, Mouthrinses and Remineralization
Presenting author's disclosure statement: Employed by J&J