84 Dentin Wettability of  Model Quaternary-Ammonium-Methacrylate Resins

Thursday, March 22, 2012: 8 a.m. - 9:30 a.m.
Presentation Type: Oral Session
A. TEZVERGIL-MUTLUAY1, F. RUEGGEBERG2, M. MUTLUAY1, M. CADENARO3, K. AGEE4, L. BRESCHI3, F. TAY5, and D. PASHLEY6, 1University of Turku, Turku, Finland, 2Oral Rehabilitation, Georgia Health Sciences University, Augusta, GA, 3Department of Medical Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy, 4School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, 5Oral Biology & Maxillofacial Pathology, Georgia Health Sciences University, College of Dental Medicine, Augusta, GA, 6Dept. Oral Biology, Georgia Health Sciences University, Augusta, GA

Recently, inhibition of host-derived MMPs by quaternary ammonium methacrylates (QAMs) showed promising results. However, the optimum use would be to incorporate QAMs into adhesive resins. Objectives: To evaluate the dentin wettability of a  range of quaternary ammonium-methacrylates (QAMs). Methods: A range of commercial QAMs were added to co-monomer mixtures of TEGDMA (30 wt%), HEMA (10 wt%), and BisGMA (wt% varied) and dentin wettability was measured on mid-coronal dentin discs with contact angle measurements (DSA 30,  Krüss GmbH Germany) using sessile drop method. The groups were: ATA (5, 10, 15 wt%); MCMS (5, 10, 15 wt%), METMAC (5, 10, 15 wt%); MAPTAC 5 wt%; a control without QAM (NQC); and a commercial control (Scotchbond Multipurpose Adhesive bottle (SBMP) (3M ESPE). Abbreviations defined in J Dent Res 2011;90:525-540. A 2 µL drop of  resin was dispensed on a standard smear-covered, 15 s acid-etched moist dentin surface and the change in contact angle over 180 s time was evaluated using tangent drop shape analysis.  Data (n=10/group) were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey test (alpha=0.05).  Results: The table presents mean contact angle degrees and (SD) of groups over time.

Reading time (s)

NQC

SBMP

ATA

5%

ATA

10%

ATA

15%

METMAC

5%

METMAC

10%

METMAC

15%

MCMS

5%

MCMS

10%

MCMS

15%

MAPTAC

5%

0

49.3(4.6)

43.1 (9.1)

47.4 (3.6)

46.3 (5.7)

38.9 (5.3)

43.5 (7.2)

41.0 (5.3)

41.9 (6.0)

43.4 (5.8)

39.7 (5.3)

40.94(6.2)

48.5 (4.5)

10

43.8(3.2)

39.3 (9.7)

41.4 (3.5)

39.6 (6.6)

33.0 (6.5)

38.3 (7.2)

35.8 (5.3)

37.3 (6.5)

36.0 (5.9)

34.1 (3.8)

35.04(7.8)

44.7 (5.7)

180

41.3(7.3)

34.0 (9.2)

39.5 (3.8)

32.0 (3.3)

26.9 (7.3)

32.1 (8.4)

27.8 (8.6)

27.6 (9.6)

29.0 (6.9)

27.1 (4.2)

24.56(5.9)

38.9 (5.9)

The ANOVA indicated that both major factors resin type (p<.001) and time after deposition (p <.001) had significant influences on resin wetting of dentin.  Most QAM-blends showed better wettability compared to the NQC and comparable wettability to SBMP.   Generally increasing the QAM concentration increased the wettability slightly over time but the difference was not significant p>0.05.

Conclusions: QAM-containing resin-blends are successful candidates for experimental adhesive resin blends. 

Supported, in part, by grants R01DE015305 from the NIDCR (PI: DP) and by #8126472 from the Academy of Finland (PI: AT-M).

 

 

 

 

This abstract is based on research that was funded entirely or partially by an outside source: R01DE015305 from the NIDCR #8126472 from the Academy of Finland

Keywords: Adhesion, Dentin and Dentin bonding agents