Method: Commercially available gutta-percha based points [LexiconTM (pink and green)] from Dentsply Tulsa Dental, ActivGPTM, BC Gutta-PerchaTM, EndosequenceTM Gutta-Percha from Brasseler USA, and EndoRezTM from Ultradent Products (n=5/brand) were analyzed using DSC (20°C →200°C →0°C at 10°C/min). Thermograms were qualitatively compared and thermal melting parameters (temperature and enthalpy change) were compared via ANOVA/Tukey (a=.05).
Result:
Results are shown in the table below.
Point |
Main Melting Peak (oC) |
Melting Enthalpy DH (J/g) |
Lexicon-Pink |
49.4 C |
10.2 AB |
Lexicon-Green |
50.4 B |
9.5 B |
Activ GP |
51.1 AB |
11.0 A |
BC GP |
49.1 C |
10.7 A |
Endosequence GP |
51.7 A |
10.6 A |
EndoRez |
47.5 D |
9.7 B |
Different letters for each parameter denote significant (p<0.05) differences between groups. Qualitatively, subtle differences appeared in the thermograms of the respective points.
Conclusion: Significantly different melting parameters were noted among the gutta-percha based points. However, the magnitude of the differences is most likely not clinically significant, indicating the various manufacturing processes do not appreciably change the thermal properties of the gutta-percha points.
Keywords: Biomaterials, Endodontics, Physical and thermal