VAR CF0985 NUMBER OF DISLIKES - HOUSE REP CAND COLUMNS 659 - 659 NUMERIC MD EQ 6 OR GE 7 Is/Was there anything in particular that you didn't like about <U.S. House Republican candidate>? What is/was that? Anything else? SUMMARY: NUMBER OF DISLIKES -- REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE ------------------------------------------------------------------- USE WEIGHT VARIABLE VCF0009/VCF0009A/VCF0009B. Republican candidate's name from election held during year of IW was given. Four possible mentions were coded in all original NES datasets except 1988 and later, which coded 5. If R's response to "Is there anything in particular that you liked about the US House Republican candidate" was "I don't know anything about this candidate," then this question was not asked and VCF0985 has been coded 6. Rs who responded "no" to "Is there anything in particular that you didn't like about the US House Republican candidate?" have been coded here as 0 mentions. "DK" responses to this question and "I don't know anything about this candidate" responses have been maintained as MD codes, unlike VCF0401-402 and VCF0405-406, because of the very high numbers of respondents falling into these categories [for consistency, NA responses to this question has also been retained as MD]. In addition, if R responded "yes" to "Is there anything in particular that you disliked about the US House Republican candidate" but R provided no mentions (DK or NA in first mention), then s/he has been coded in the corresponding MD category in VCF0985. In one district in 1992, two Republican 'incumbents' ran against each other (LA06) due to redistricting, but neither candidate had previously represented the geographic area corresponding to the reconfigured district. As a result, this race has been treated as an open race. In House-level thermometers, likes/dislikes, contact etc., one Republican candidate (always the same one) has been folded into the data normally pertaining to the Democratic candidate [SEE VCF0980-981]. VCF0902 (type of race) code 45 can be used to filter such Republican 1992 cases from "Democratic" variables. For 1984 and 1992: if R was in a district where no Republican candidate was running BUT the interview administered was an abbreviated telephone interview (1984) or a short form interview (1992), then VCF0985 has been coded 9, not 8. Responses referring to an independent or 'other' candidate are not recorded here for districts having only one major party candidate (e.g. type race 23 in VCF0902). NOTE: VCF0984-987 have not been altered as a result of corrections to 1978 data for type of House race (see notes VCF0902). 1998 note: 1 case (0062) that was coded "yes" in the 1998 study data as response whether there was anything R liked about the Republican House candidate should have been coded "I don't know anything about this candidate" but has been correctly categorized in variables VCF0984 and VCF0985. In 1996 and 1998, randomization occurred for the order in which the Democratic and Republican House candidate names were administered for the set of 'likes/dislikes' questions; note that for each candidate 'likes' preceded 'dislikes,' and both 'likes' and 'dislikes' questions were administered for one candidate before questions concerning the next candidate were begun. 0. Zero negative mentions (dislikes) 1. One negative mention (dislikes) 2. Two negative mentions (dislikes) 3. Three negative mentions (dislikes) 4. Four or more negative mentions (dislikes) 6. "I don't know anything about this candidate" (VOLUNTEERED) 7. DK if disliked anything about candidate; disliked something about candidate but DK what 8. No Republican candidate in R's district (includes Washington D.C.) 9. NA if disliked anything about candidate; disliked something about candidate but NA what; INAP, no post IW (1980, 1984, 1988, 1992, 1996); abbrev. telephone IW (1984); short form (1992); question not used 1978: 175-179 1980: 907-911 1982: 163-167 1984: 923-927 1986: 199-203 1988: 692-697 1990: 216-221 1992: 5419-5424 1994: 419-424 1996: 961062-961067 1998: 980293-980298 ==============================