next up previous
Next: VAR CF9082 DEM PRES Up: No Title Previous: VAR CF9080 PRESIDENT-7PT LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE

VAR CF9081 DEM PRES CAND- 7PT DEFENSE SPEND SCALE

VAR CF9081    DEM PRES CAND- 7PT DEFENSE SPEND SCALE                          
              COLUMNS 822  - 822                                              
              NUMERIC                                                         
              MD EQ 0 OR GE 8                                                 

        Some people believe that we should spend much less money for defense. 
        Others feel that defense spending should be greatly increased.        
                                                                              
        Where would you place <the Democratic Presidential Candidate> on this 
        scale? (7-POINT SCALE SHOWN TO R)                                     
                                                                              
        DEFENSE SPENDING-- DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE'S RATING ONPOINT 
        SCALE                                                                 
        -------------------------------------------------------------------   
                                                                              
        USE WEIGHT VARIABLE VCF0009/VCF0009A/VCF0009B.                        
                                                                              
        This variable referred to Carter in 1980, Mondale in 1984, Dukakis in 
        1988, and Clinton in 1992 and 1996.                                   
                                                                              
        NO SELF-PLACEMENT INAPS:                                              
        In all years except 1996, if R replied DK or "haven't thought much    
        about it" rating self on same 7-point scale, then R was not asked this
        question.                                                             
                                                                              
        In 1996, randomization occurred for the order of the 3 major          
        Presidential candidate names for this placement.                      
                                                                              
               1.   GREATLY DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING                         
               2.                                                             
               3.                                                             
               4.                                                             
               5.                                                             
               6.                                                             
               7.   GREATLY INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING                         
                                                                              
               8.   DK                                                        
               9.  NA;INAP, short-form or Spanish language IW (1992); question
                    not used                                                  
              0.  Inap, R self-rating is DK or "Haven't thought much about it"
                    (not 1996)                                                
                                                                              
        1980:  282     1984:  397      1988:  311                             
        1992:  3709    1996:  960466                                          
                                                                              
                                                                              
==============================


Walter Mebane
Mon Nov 12 02:55:58 EST 2001