- What are the models being compared?
- MAGNIT is semi-physical (partially math and physics based)
- RLM is empirical (data-based) and is the original auroral conductance model in RIM.
- CMEE is empirical (data-based) and is RLM having used a larger database.
- How are the models being compaed?
- Accuracy: How well can the model exactly reproduce data? (RMSE, MSE, MAE)
- Bias: Is the model systematically different than the observed data? (ME, mean)
- Precision: After bias is removed, how similar do data and models cluster? (YI, standard deviation (ratio and difference))
- Extremes: Is the distribution of model and data different than a typical Gaussian? (Skew and kurtosis (difference))
- Correlation: How well does the model follow the up/down trends of the data? (R)
- Skill: Is the model able to predict variations of fluxesaround the mean? (PE)
- What event is being used?
- Is this work being published?
The auroral conductance models are coupled with the Ridley Ionosphere Model (RIM) and BATSRUS within the Space Weather Modeling Framework.
Model performance can be described by many different metrics that tell a different perspective of the story.
The Galaxy-15 event occured on April 5th, 2010 and is a ICME driven period of activity associated with a substorm with an extreme dipolarization. It is named after the complete failure of the Galaxy 15 satellite due to the event.
Yes, the work has culminated into a paper currently under review in Frontiers journal Astronomy and Space Sciences, for their special collection 'Uncertainty Quantification and Model Validation in Space Weather Modeling'.
Studying the metrics numerically: Studying the metrics graphically: