Social and Political
With the exception of Philosophy and Public Affairs, the trend seems to be down in every journal. This surprised me a lot. In part this was because the journals stopped publishing work on history and culture. In part it was because the model insisted that life and value, what I thought of as idealist ethics, was really a topic in social and political, not ethics. But in part it was because the study ended before the boom in social and political work in the mid-2010s.
Table 4.3: Points excluded from topic graph for social and political
Life and value |
1901 |
0.0806 |
Life and value |
1902 |
0.0717 |
Life and value |
1904 |
0.0659 |
Life and value |
1905 |
0.0681 |
Life and value |
1906 |
0.0646 |
Life and value |
1909 |
0.0602 |
Life and value |
1912 |
0.0602 |
Life and value |
1913 |
0.0978 |
Life and value |
1915 |
0.0796 |
Life and value |
1916 |
0.0776 |
Life and value |
1918 |
0.0865 |
Life and value |
1919 |
0.0845 |
Life and value |
1920 |
0.0987 |
Life and value |
1921 |
0.0995 |
Life and value |
1922 |
0.0678 |
Life and value |
1923 |
0.0827 |
Life and value |
1924 |
0.0808 |
Life and value |
1925 |
0.0671 |
Life and value |
1926 |
0.0719 |
Life and value |
1927 |
0.0647 |
Life and value |
1931 |
0.0674 |
This, I think makes the story about what happened from 1950-2013 make more sense. There was a Rawlsian boom—it shows up clearly in egalitarainism and liberal democracy. There was even a small bit of interest in feminism. But the drop-off of interest in Marx, and in history and culture, more than made up for it. Given how often I’ve heard people complain about the excessive amount of Rawlsiana in the late twentieth-century journals, this was rather of a surprise. Of course, you may think that Marxism, and the French Revolution, were slightly more important subjects of detailed study than A Theory of Justice, no matter how good a book it is.
4.10 Social and Political
Figure 4.24: Proportion of each journal’s yearly publications in Social and Political Philosophy
With the exception of Philosophy and Public Affairs, the trend seems to be down in every journal. This surprised me a lot. In part this was because the journals stopped publishing work on history and culture. In part it was because the model insisted that life and value, what I thought of as idealist ethics, was really a topic in social and political, not ethics. But in part it was because the study ended before the boom in social and political work in the mid-2010s.
Figure 4.25: Topics in Social and Political
This, I think makes the story about what happened from 1950-2013 make more sense. There was a Rawlsian boom—it shows up clearly in egalitarainism and liberal democracy. There was even a small bit of interest in feminism. But the drop-off of interest in Marx, and in history and culture, more than made up for it. Given how often I’ve heard people complain about the excessive amount of Rawlsiana in the late twentieth-century journals, this was rather of a surprise. Of course, you may think that Marxism, and the French Revolution, were slightly more important subjects of detailed study than A Theory of Justice, no matter how good a book it is.